You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Growing the tlog size by 8192MB and predicting 16 new VLFs for each growth increment is only accurate up to 73728MB. After that, each new growth increment results in 1 new VLF. Therefore, the Potential VLFs begins to diverge from Actual VLFs quickly. At 122880MB, the script Potential VLFs is 240. However, the Actual VLFs achieved from growing the log from 1M to 122880MB in 8192MB increments is about 153.
This is because, "In SQL Server 2014 (12.x) and later versions, if the next growth is less than 1/8 of the current log physical size, then create 1 VLF that covers the growth size."
Growing the tlog size by 8192MB and predicting 16 new VLFs for each growth increment is only accurate up to 73728MB. After that, each new growth increment results in 1 new VLF. Therefore, the Potential VLFs begins to diverge from Actual VLFs quickly. At 122880MB, the script Potential VLFs is 240. However, the Actual VLFs achieved from growing the log from 1M to 122880MB in 8192MB increments is about 153.
This is because, "In SQL Server 2014 (12.x) and later versions, if the next growth is less than 1/8 of the current log physical size, then create 1 VLF that covers the growth size."
73728 * 1/8 = 9216
9216 < 8192 then create 1 VLF
Reference:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/sql-server-transaction-log-architecture-and-management-guide?view=sql-server-2016#virtual-log-file-creation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: