Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Intrinsics estimation on ultrawide FOV #38

Open
RichardBowenGM opened this issue Dec 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Intrinsics estimation on ultrawide FOV #38

RichardBowenGM opened this issue Dec 19, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@RichardBowenGM
Copy link

Hi,

Excellent work, thanks for the detailed paper and prompt model release!

I think that the method systematically underestimates focal length on ultrawide images. For example, here is an iPhone 13 Pro ultrawide image:

Image

MoGe estimates a focal length of 1767.9873 pixels, or about 97 degrees hFOV. But the GT hFOV for this device is about 108 degrees. In testing I have done, there seems to be a pretty consistent bias to underestimate on these.

I don't know of a nice public dataset of images of this kind to show this to you. But I can produce a related behavior by taking a public dataset with known intrinsics (Cambridge Landmarks Dataset) and cropping in the vertical. As the crop gets more extreme, MoGe's estimate gets biased towards being big:

Image

(I attached a jupyter notebook you can use to reproduce these plots: cambridge intrinsics.ipynb.zip).

BTW, it's not reproduced here, but taking a cambridge image and cropping the per-pixel pointcloud, rather than the image itself, does not reproduce this behavior. So, I think it is not a problem with the LM solver step.

I wonder if you have any comment or ideas for improving the estimation accuracy here? Is it just that these weird crops/FOVs are well outside the training distribution?

@RichardBowenGM RichardBowenGM changed the title Intrinsics estimation on Intrinsics estimation on ultrawide FOV Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant