Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Regarding the scale of the ground truth point maps in training. #37

Closed
GonzaloMartinGarcia opened this issue Dec 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

Comments

@GonzaloMartinGarcia
Copy link

Hi, congrats on the amazing results!

I have a question regarding the scale of the ground truth point map when it is aligned with the prediction in the ROE solver. From the paper, I assume that the ground truth is provided in metric scale, and that using inverse depth (1/z) for the weights helps unify differences between indoor and outdoor scenes. Are there any additional normalization steps applied to the ground truth before the alignment, such as centering or bounding box normalization, or is the alignment done directly in metric scale?

This would also influence how one chooses the \tau hyperparameter parameter, given that scene scale differences might affect when their errors are clipped.

Thanks and regards.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant