Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gaussian blurring #53

Open
nontas opened this issue Jul 13, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

Gaussian blurring #53

nontas opened this issue Jul 13, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@nontas
Copy link
Member

nontas commented Jul 13, 2015

We need to decide whether to add the option of Gaussian blurring in our builders. I ran some indicative experiments with holistic AAMs (features=double_igo, diagonal=180, scales=(1., 0.5, 0.25), scale_shapes=True, scale_features=True, n_shape=[5, 10, 15], n_appearance=100, max_iters=60) and the blurring seems to constantly increase the performance. I used LFPW training and testing sets. See the following tables for details:

1) ModifiedAlternatingInverseCompositional algorithm:

Blurring noise_std 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 mean median std
False 0.0 31.2 78.6 92.4 98.7 0.0252 0.0231 0.0096
True 0.0 31.2 81.7 94.6 99.1 0.0246 0.0229 0.0083
False 0.04 30.4 76.3 87.5 92.0 0.0286 0.0230 0.0190
True 0.04 32.1 78.6 90.6 93.8 0.0269 0.0230 0.0150

2) WibergInverseCompositional algorithm:

Blurring noise_std 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 mean median std
False 0.0 31.2 78.1 92.4 98.2 0.0253 0.0232 0.0096
True 0.0 31.7 81.2 94.2 98.7 0.0248 0.0231 0.0087
False 0.04 30.4 75.9 87.5 92.0 0.0286 0.0230 0.0188
True 0.04 30.4 79.5 91.5 95.5 0.0265 0.0231 0.0142

However, after mentioning this to @jalabort , it seems that it is not easy to add this option for all builders. The biggest problem seems to be how to determine the value of sigma that would be used in the gaussian_pyramid method.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant