Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
425 lines (310 loc) · 19.4 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

425 lines (310 loc) · 19.4 KB
Raw

Manta Developer Guide

Table of Contents

Scope

This guide provides:

  • protocols for contributing new or modified methods
  • methods to debug stability or runtime issues
  • methods to debug suspected false or missing variant calls
  • high-level architectural documentation

Information is added as pertinent questions/discussions come up in the contributor community, so this guide is not intended to provide complete coverage of the above topics.

For end user documentation describing how to run an analysis and interpret its output, please see the User Guide.

Developer Build Notes

The following section provides a supplement to the standard build instructions including additional details of interest to methods developers.

Building from source repository vs. versioned code distribution

When the source repository is cloned from github, it is configured for development rather than user distribution. In this configuration all builds are strict such that:

  • all warnings are treated as errors
  • if cppcheck is found any detected cppcheck issue is converted to a build error (see details below)

Note that all unit tests are always run and required to pass for the build procedure to complete.

Static analysis

When the build is configured for development, static analysis is run on all project c++ source using cppcheck, so long as an appropriate cppcheck version can be found in the user's path. This static analysis step is configured as follows:

  • cppcheck will be used if it can be found in the user's path and the version found is at least 1.69
  • The script which runs and interprets cppcheck is run_cppcheck.py.
  • Any cppcheck warning will be treated as an error. A few warnings are suppressed, depending on the cppcheck version.
  • All cppcheck warnings are reformatted to follow standard gcc/clang error message style to work correctly in most IDEs.
  • All project c++ code will be analyzed, but third-party/redistributed packages are ignored.

Source auto-documentation

If doxygen is found in the path (and optionally dot as well) during build configuration, then c++ documentation is available as an additional "doc" target for the makefile:

make doc

There is no installation for the documentation outside of the build directory, the root doxygen page after completing this target will be:

${MANTA_BUILD_PATH}/src/c++/doxygen/html/index.html

Improving build time

ccache

The build system is configured to use ccache whenever this is found in the path

Bundled dependencies

Note that during the configuration step, the following dependencies will be built from source if they are not found:

  • cmake 2.8.12+
  • boost 1.58.0+

To avoid the extra time associated with this step, ensure that (1) cmake 2.8.12+ is in your PATH and (2) BOOST_ROOT is defined to point to boost 1.58.0 or newer.

General Debugging Notes

General Debugging: Address Sanitizer

The build system offers first-class support for google address sanitizer when a supporting compiler is detected. To use this mode, start a fresh installation process with the additional configure option --build-type=ASan, for example:

../configure --jobs=4 --prefix=/path/to/install --build-type=ASan

General Debugging: Inspecting temporary files

Manta's configuration step includes an extended option to keep all temporary files which would normally be deleted by the workflow as it runs. Keeping these files may be helpful in various debugging scenarios. To turn on this option, add --retainTempFiles as a configuration argument:

configManta.py [other_options...] --retainTempFiles

Windows development support

Manta does not link or run on windows. However, the build system does facilitate Visual Studio (VS) users. When cmake configuration is run on windows, all linking is disabled and most third party libraries are unpacked for header include access, but are not compiled. Cmake VS solutions allow the c++ code to be browsed, analyzed and compiled to the library level. Note that unit test codes are compiled to libraries but cannot be run.

C++11 features in use require at least VS2013. A Windows installation of cmake and zlib are also required to configure and compile. Note that the minimum cmake version is 3.1.0 for Windows. Windows zlib is provided by the gnuwin32 package among others.

Automating Portable Binary Builds for Linux

A script is provided to enable a dockerized build process which issues binary tarballs for a variety of OS/compiler configurations, with the goal of creating a reasonably portable linux binary build by using a relatively old OS/glibc version. To use this script, ensure you have permission to docker run on the current system and execute the following script:

${SOURCE_PATH}/scratch/docker/deployment/dockerBuildBinaryTarball.bash ${SOURCE_PATH2} ${BINARY_BUILD_PREFIX}

The term ${SOURCE_PATH2} can point to the current git repository (ie. ${SOURCE_PATH}), or to an extracted source release tarball previously created using the script:

${SOURCE_PATH}/scratch/make_release_tarball.bash

The choice of virtualized build environment is hard-coded in the deploy script for the time being, see the builderImage variable.

Coding Guidelines

Supported project languages are C++11 for core methods development and python2 (2.6+) for workflow and scripting support.

Source formatting

  • Basic formatting restrictions on c++ code:
    • spaces instead of tabs
    • 2-space indents
  • Note the above restrictions, in addition to others, are enforced by a clang-format script which is occasionally run on the develop branch (see run_cxx_formatter.bash)
  • Name formatting for all newly introduced code:
    • Make variable/type names self-documenting whereever this is practical, e.g. sampleCount, breakpointRegion, etc.
    • Lowercase camelCase variable names
    • Uppercase CamelCase type names
    • Private class members start with a leading underscore, e.g. _sampleName.
  • Otherwise, follow local code conventions

Git conventions

Commit messages

All git commit messages should be prepended with either the associated JIRA or github issue id. For example:

MANTA-123 Improve insertion genotype accuracy

Improve assembly and realignemnt of large insertions to reduce hom->het undercall.

Very minor updates may be made without an associated ticket. In these cases providing a category prefix for the minor change is still encouraged to provide context, for instance:

docs: Fix paths in user guide examples

build: Close new warnings from clang-4.0.0

All git commit messages should conform to practices outlined here:

http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/

Commit consolidation

On any single-developer research branch, history editing is encouraged within the branch to collapse bugs and build a more clear feature-by-feature story for other other developers to follow.

In all other situations history editing is discouraged and a conventional merge-based workflow is preferred.

Changelog conventions

The primary function of the changelog is to help end-users weigh the benefits and risks or updating to a newer version.

To this end:

  • Changelog entries should be made for any major branch merge, bug fix, or generally something that would change a user's interaction at the configuration step, change the format/interpretation of the output or change the variant calling performance.
  • The project changelog follows many of the conventions suggested in keepachangelog. Consistent with this formatting, changelog entries should be more descriptive and end-user focused than git commit entries. JIRA or github ticket IDs should be listed at the end of the Changelog description to help developers link issues, without making this the emphasis of each changelog entry.
  • Each major branch with an end-user impact should add a changelog entry to the Unreleased section of the changelog prior to merging the branch.
  • For consistency with the git commit log, try to follow a similar summary style even though descriptions can be much longer, for instance by starting all major bullet points with an imperitive verb.

Branching and release tagging guidelines

All features and bugfixes are developed on separate branches. Branch names should contain the corresponding JIRA ticket id or contain the key "github${issueNumber}' to refer to the corresponding issue on github.com. After code review and testing, all branches intended for release are merged to the 'develop' branch. Releases are tagged on the development branch, and the corresponding release tag can be pushed to the 'master' branch. Thus the master branch always represents the most recent stable release. As required version specific development branches are created to support continued bugfix iterations on older releases. These branches replace the patch number in the release version with an "x", for instance the "v2.4.x" branch would be used to provide bugfix updates "v2.4.2", "v2.4.3", etc.

Error handling

General Policies

  • Exceptions with informative contextual details are encouraged whenever possible.
  • To quickly express invariants it is acceptable to add assert()'s first, and transition to exceptions as code stabilizes.
  • Note that the build process will never define NDEBUG to compile out assert statements, even in release code.
  • Exceptions are never thrown with the intent to recover -- this is not a web browser. The goal is to:
    • Fail at the first sign of trouble.
    • Provide as much helpful contextual information as possible, including context from multiple layers of the stack.
  • Warnings are discouraged. If considering a warning you should probably just fail per the above policy.

Exception Details

  • Preferred exception pattern is to use an internal class GeneralException derived from boost::exception:
#include "common/Exceptions.hpp"

#include <sstream>

void
foo(const char* name)
{
    using namespace illumina::common;

    std::ostringstream oss;
    oss << "Unrecognized variant scoring model name: '" << name << "'";
    BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION(GeneralException(oss.str()));
}

  • Best practice for exception messages designed to avoid redundant boilerplate at the throw site:

    • Avoid adding a standard "ERROR" or "EXCEPTION" prefix
    • Avoid ending the message with a newline. For multi-line exception messages the ending newline may make sense on a case-by-case basis.

  • Context at the original throw site is often supplemented by a 'catch and release' block to add information at a few critical points on the stack as the stack is unwound. Typically this is information which is unavailable at the throw site.

    • The preferred method to implement this is to use boost::error_info. This only works for exceptions derived from illumina::common::ExceptionData, such as the above noted GeneralException class.
    • The first template argument to boost::error_info (edge_error_info in the example below) is an arbitrary empty struct, the name of which will be printed with the metadata proceeding the given string (this seems to be some kind of tag dispatch mechanism in the boost exception library). The coding convention is to create an informative category name for each instance where this exception decoration pattern occurs.
    • An example of using this pattern in code follows:
catch (illumina::common::ExceptionData& e)
{
    // decorate an in-flight exception:
    std::ostringstream oss;
    oss << "Can't find return edge to node index: " << _index << ":" << fromIndex << " in remote node index: " << _index << ":" << fromNodeEdgeIter.first << "\n"
        << "\tlocal_node: " << fromNode
        << "\tremote_node: " << remoteNode;

    // Note that the struct 'edge_error_info" is just an arbitrary tag name applied to this string, any name can be
    // used for this purpose at each exception decoration site:
    e << boost::error_info<struct edge_error_info,std::string>(oss.str());
    throw;
}
  • More details on boost::error_info usage:
catch (illumina::common::ExceptionData& e)
{
    // use a boost error_info type to supplement the current exception message
    e << boost::error_info<struct extra_exception_message,std::string>("FOO");

    //  to further supplement the exception message, change the tag struct to
    // create another boost error_info type
    e << boost::error_info<struct current_candidate_info,std::string>("BAR");

    // Note that repeating any type will result in only the last message being
    // printed to standard error, eg:
    //
    // e << boost::error_info<struct special_message, std::string>("BAR1");
    // e << boost::error_info<struct special_message, std::string>("BAR2");
    //
    // ...would result in only the second message "BAR2", being rended in the final exception message.

    throw;
}
  • A more general backup to the above method that works for all exception types is a simple stderr print at the catch site. In this case the information will be a bit out of order, but this will get the job done:
catch (...)
{
    log_os << "Exception caught in align_pos() while realigning segment: "
           << static_cast<int>(r.second) << " of read: " << (*r.first) << "\n";
    throw;
}
Exception example

The following example shows an exception message with two messages added during stack unwinding using the boost::error_info mechanism described above (Additional cmdline/version details are added at the end of the message by the lowest-level catch site for each binary).

FATAL_ERROR: 2018-Jan-02 16:27:53 /src/c++/lib/applications/GenerateSVCandidates/SVCandidateAssemblyRefiner.cpp(985): Throw in function void processLargeInsertion(const SVCandidate&, pos_t, pos_t, const GlobalAligner<int>&, const std::vector<unsigned int>&, const std::set<int>&, SVCandidateAssemblyData&, const GSCOptions&)
Dynamic exception type: boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<illumina::common::GeneralException>
std::exception::what: Large insertion alignment procedure produced invalid zero-length alignment target

[runGSC(GSCOptions const&, char const*, char const*)::current_edge_info*] = Exception caught while processing graph edge: edgeinfo locus:node1:node2: 3360:0:0
        node1:LocusNode: GenomeInterval: 19:[44215749,44215797) n_edges: 1 out_count: 18 evidence: [44215637,44215909)
        EdgeTo: 0 out_count: 18
        node1:EndUserGenomeInterval: chr20:44215750-44215797

[SVCandidateProcessor::evaluateCandidate(EdgeInfo const&, SVMultiJunctionCandidate const&, SVCandidateSetData const&, bool, SVEvidenceWriterData&)::assembly_candidate_info*] = Exception caught while attempting to assemble SVCandidate:
        isImprecise?: 1
        forwardTranscriptStrandReadCount: 0 ; reverseTranscriptStrandReadCount: 0
        index candidate:assemblyAlign:assemblySegment: 0:0:0
        Breakend: GenomeInterval: 19:[44215749,44215797) COMPLEX
        SVBreakendLowResEvidence: pair: 0 local_pair: 0 cigar: 0 softclip: 0 semialign: 6 shadow: 0 split_align: 0 unknown: 0

        Breakend: GenomeInterval: 19:[44215749,44215797) UNKNOWN
        SVBreakendLowResEvidence: pair: 0 local_pair: 0 cigar: 0 softclip: 0 semialign: 0 shadow: 0 split_align: 0 unknown: 0



cmdline:        /install/libexec/GenerateSVCandidates --align-stats /MantaWorkflow/workspace/alignmentStats.xml --graph-file /MantaWorkflow/workspace/svLocusGraph.bin --bin-index 197 --bin-count 256 --max-edge-count 10 --min-candidate-sv-size 8 --min-candidate-spanning-count 3 --min-scored-sv-size 50 --ref /Homo_sapiens/NCBI/GRCh38Decoy/Sequence/WholeGenomeFasta/genome.fa --candidate-output-file /MantaWorkflow/workspace/svHyGen/candidateSV.0197.vcf --diploid-output-file /MantaWorkflow/workspace/svHyGen/diploidSV.0197.vcf --min-qual-score 10 --min-pass-qual-score 20 --min-pass-gt-score 15 --edge-runtime-log /MantaWorkflow/workspace/svHyGen/edgeRuntimeLog.0197.txt --edge-stats-log /MantaWorkflow/workspace/svHyGen/edgeStats.0197.xml --align-file /alignedSamples/NA12878/PCRfree/NA12878-PCRFree_S1.bam
version:        1.2.2-15-g34b1b79-dirty
buildTime:      2018-01-03T00:25:46.835456Z
compiler:       g++-5.4.0

Logging

  • At the workflow (python) layer, please write all logging messages through pyflow's logging interface as follows:
self.flowLog("Initiating Starling workflow version: %s" % (__version__)
  • At the binary (c++) layer, there is no logger at present. Direct all error messaging to std::cerr.

Unit tests

  • Unit tests are enabled for a subset of the c++ code
  • All tests use the boost unit test framework
  • All unit tests are required to run and pass as part of every build (including end-user builds)
  • Unit tests are already enabled for every library "test" subdirectory, additional tests in these directories will be automatically detected

IDE support

Little support for any specific IDE is provided, except as made available by cmake generators. IDE-specific configuration files maintained in the project are described below.

Clion

A subset of code formatting settings which can be imported into Clion are available in the configuration file

${STRELKA_REPO_PATH}/scratch/ideConfiguration/CLion/referenceCodeStyleSettings.xml

..note that the automated astyle formatting settings still define the project defaults, the above configuration simply provides a starting point for CLion which is closer to the project's formatting norms.

Special Topic Guides

The following items provide more in-depth details on a subsection of the methods/debugging protocol, etc.