Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feedback for “Client libraries” - Ruby support #953

Open
metkat opened this issue Jul 30, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Feedback for “Client libraries” - Ruby support #953

metkat opened this issue Jul 30, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
priority: low (improvements) An idea how the representation of knowledge on a certain page could be improved

Comments

@metkat
Copy link

metkat commented Jul 30, 2024

Hey, I'm not sure listing ActiveGraph and neo4j-ruby-driver as viable libraries for Ruby to use Memgraph is accurate. :/ It's seemed like they've been being maintained by one person for quite a while, and he's very focused on JRuby rather than standard ruby. There's no version of ActiveGraph that works with current Rails releases, the last several versions of neo4j-ruby-driver are jruby-only, also both are very oriented toward Neo4j and don't especially work with Memgraph.

see:
neo4jrb/activegraph#1702
neo4jrb/neo4j-ruby-driver#230

I'm unaware of any other Bolt library for Ruby, am I missing any?

@antejavor
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @metkat, thanks for bringing this to our attention and opening the issue. 🚀

We probably tried out all client connections before listing them on the docs. But it is possible we didn't do that for Ruby and built the assumption it would work because of Bolt + Cypher. I certainly know it is not in the test suit for the releases.

I will give this a shot and get back to you so we can update the docs with more realistic information if the listed clients are not working with Memgraph.

@antejavor antejavor self-assigned this Aug 1, 2024
@katarinasupe katarinasupe added the priority: low (improvements) An idea how the representation of knowledge on a certain page could be improved label Nov 4, 2024
@katarinasupe
Copy link
Contributor

@antejavor related to client work

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority: low (improvements) An idea how the representation of knowledge on a certain page could be improved
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants