You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
thanks for your enjoy!i have a try in sidd dataset of HINet,but it gives me " TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable",look for your reply,thank you!
#2
Open
zxcvads opened this issue
Dec 28, 2021
· 4 comments
Thank you for your feedback. We fixed the issue in the latest update.
It is worth mentioning that, the training size and test size for HINet on SIDD dataset are both 256x256, so there is no train-test inconsistency as mentioned in the paper.
Thank you for your feedback. We fixed the issue in the latest update. It is worth mentioning that, the training size and test size for HINet on SIDD dataset are both 256x256, so there is no train-test inconsistency as mentioned in the paper.
thanks for your reply! After your fixed code, i faced another bug:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "basicsr/test_tlsc.py", line 68, in
main()
File "basicsr/test_tlsc.py", line 64, in main
rgb2bgr=rgb2bgr, use_image=use_image)
File "/code/HINet-main/basicsr/models/base_model.py", line 58, in validation
save_img, rgb2bgr, use_image)
File "/code/HINet-main/basicsr/models/image_restoration_model.py", line 323, in nondist_validation
self.grids() #apply for demo.py
File "/code/HINet-main/basicsr/models/image_restoration_model.py", line 132, in grids
num_row = (h - 1) // crop_size + 1
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for //: 'int' and 'NoneType'
0%| | 0/1280 [00:00<?, ?image/s]
Thank you for your feedback. We fixed the issue in the latest update. It is worth mentioning that, the training size and test size for HINet on SIDD dataset are both 256x256, so there is no train-test inconsistency as mentioned in the paper.
Thank you for your feedback. We fixed the issue in the latest update. It is worth mentioning that, the training size and test size for HINet on SIDD dataset are both 256x256, so there is no train-test inconsistency as mentioned in the paper.
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: