oklch typo in note

[magicdawn]

MDN URL

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/color_value/oklch

What specific section or headline is this issue about?

Values

What information was incorrect, unhelpful, or incomplete?

What did you expect to see?

• we can define lightness with number 0-1 oklch(0.1 0 0)
• we can define lightness with percentage 0%-100% oklch(10% 0 0)
• when used in relative colors: l is a number (0-1 inclusive)

so I don't understand where the note means Here 100% is equal to the number 100 for the L value and 0.4 for the C value. ?

---

and I have tested the L value

---

So I believe this note is obselete and should be removed. and add to hsl since relative hsl 100 is equivalent to 100%. https://drafts.csswg.org/css-color-5/#relative-HSL

Do you have any supporting links, references, or citations?

No response

Do you have anything more you want to share?

No response

MDN metadata

Page report details

• Folder: en-us/web/css/color_value/oklch
• MDN URL: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/color_value/oklch
• GitHub URL: https://github.com/mdn/content/blob/main/files/en-us/web/css/color_value/oklch/index.md
• Last commit: 71a0a05
• Document last modified: 2024-10-17T19:17:21.000Z

[Josh-Cena]

This was just added in #33048, so I don't think it's obsolete, likely just a misunderstanding. @estelle?

[estelle]

The note was incorrect.

L is a <number> that corresponds to the Lightness; 1.0 is equivalent to 100%.

C is a <number> that corresponds to the chroma. 0.4 is equivalent to 100%.

H is a <number> that corresponds to the hue, in degrees, normalized to a [0, 360] range. 90 is equivalent to 90deg.

alpha is a <number> that corresponds to the alpha transparency. 1.0 is equivalent to 100%.

Fixed in #36682