-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create option to specify the control point of a head-specified well #38
Comments
Somewhat related, we once discussed an element consisting of a series of wells designed to obtain a certain drawdown at a point. I'm not sure whether this was possible or there is the issue of infinite possible solutions, but something along those lines would be cool to have? |
Yes, that is related.
The thing is that right now we need the same number of equations and
unknowns. It sounds like you suggest multiple wells and one point where the
head is specified. To solve for the discharges of the wells, you need to
specify something extra like that they are all the same (but unknown). Is
that what you had in mind?
…On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 12:58 PM Davíd Brakenhoff ***@***.***> wrote:
Somewhat related, we once discussed an element consisting of a series of
wells designed to obtain a certain drawdown at a point. I'm not sure
whether this was possible or there is the issue of infinite possible
solutions, but something along those lines would be cool to have?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#38 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKM3SDNXHRMMT7XAIKRDD3ROANN5ANCNFSM4MO557ZQ>
.
|
Yea, the idea came from the way vacuum dewatering is implemented, with several wells attached to the same vacuum pump (as far as I know anyway). So multiple wells with equal discharge with a specified head a at a point would work. |
That's actually pretty easy, but a separate issue. It is similar to a
LineSinkDitchString.
Can you create an issue? And if you are bored sitting at home, you may even
want to take a crack at it!
…On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:20 PM Davíd Brakenhoff ***@***.***> wrote:
Yea, the idea came from the way vacuum dewatering is implemented, with
several wells attached to the same vacuum pump (as far as I know anyway).
So multiple wells with equal discharge with a specified head a at a point
would work.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#38 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKM3SDPOUROSAPM3LWMYLLROAP57ANCNFSM4MO557ZQ>
.
|
1 similar comment
That's actually pretty easy, but a separate issue. It is similar to a
LineSinkDitchString.
Can you create an issue? And if you are bored sitting at home, you may even
want to take a crack at it!
…On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:20 PM Davíd Brakenhoff ***@***.***> wrote:
Yea, the idea came from the way vacuum dewatering is implemented, with
several wells attached to the same vacuum pump (as far as I know anyway).
So multiple wells with equal discharge with a specified head a at a point
would work.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#38 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKM3SDPOUROSAPM3LWMYLLROAP57ANCNFSM4MO557ZQ>
.
|
The control point of a head-specified well is at the right side of the well on the radius. Sometimes it is useful to have the control point somewhere totally different, for example on the edge of a building pit.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: