From 2f832018a2c0da77335fde33b964e673c2243b96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Pravat <dpravat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 11:09:06 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Windows: [2/3] Libprocess: Used `os::random`.

Review: https://reviews.apache.org/r/47221/
---
 3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/sequence_tests.cpp | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/sequence_tests.cpp b/3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/sequence_tests.cpp
index 566393fbf3f..22863121711 100644
--- a/3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/sequence_tests.cpp
+++ b/3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/sequence_tests.cpp
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include <process/sequence.hpp>
 
 #include <stout/nothing.hpp>
+#include <stout/os.hpp>
 
 using process::Clock;
 using process::Future;
@@ -255,7 +256,7 @@ TEST(SequenceTest, Random)
     // We randomly do 'pulse' and 'verify'. The idea here is that: if
     // sequence is not used, a 'verify' may see an intermediate
     // result of a 'pulse', in which case the value is not zero.
-    if (::random() % 2 == 0) {
+    if (os::random() % 2 == 0) {
       f = defer(process, &RandomProcess::pulse);
     } else {
       f = defer(process, &RandomProcess::verify);