You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If we allow cyclic bubbles (#241), then I guess we should also allow cyclic frayed ropes for the sake of consistency? I don't think this will mess with "interpretation" of the frayed rope pattern, since the structure still converges then diverges (see Miller et al. 2010).
Allowing this should be fairly simple, since it's just a matter of removing an explicit check I added in (shown below):
forninending_node_ids:
# Check for extraneous incoming edgesiflen(g.pred[n]) !=1:
returnValidationResults()
foroinlist(g.adj[n].keys()):
# We know now that all of the ending nodes only have one# incoming node, but we don't know that about the starting# nodes. Make sure that this frayed rope isn't cyclical.ifoinstarting_node_ids:
returnValidationResults()
Update: extra motivation to leave this in (and something to look for once it's merged in): there are some obvious frayed ropes that aren't tagged currently because of cyclic edges like this - for example in the august1 srs049959 graph:
Unless I'm missing something, I think this update should allow these ropes to be tagged.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If we allow cyclic bubbles (#241), then I guess we should also allow cyclic frayed ropes for the sake of consistency? I don't think this will mess with "interpretation" of the frayed rope pattern, since the structure still converges then diverges (see Miller et al. 2010).
Allowing this should be fairly simple, since it's just a matter of removing an explicit check I added in (shown below):
Update: extra motivation to leave this in (and something to look for once it's merged in): there are some obvious frayed ropes that aren't tagged currently because of cyclic edges like this - for example in the august1 srs049959 graph:
Unless I'm missing something, I think this update should allow these ropes to be tagged.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: