From b88cc7c0b5a75bcda0ede84263f2a37c93ee2d22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Wendt Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:37:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix exception in dav provider --- wsgidav/request_server.py | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/wsgidav/request_server.py b/wsgidav/request_server.py index 4dffae43..0d0d857c 100644 --- a/wsgidav/request_server.py +++ b/wsgidav/request_server.py @@ -1442,7 +1442,7 @@ def do_OPTIONS(self, environ, start_response): allow.extend(["HEAD", "GET", "PROPFIND"]) # if provider.propManager is not None: # allow.extend( [ "PROPFIND" ] ) - if not provider.isReadOnly(): + if not provider.is_readonly(): allow.extend(["DELETE", "COPY", "MOVE", "PROPPATCH"]) # if provider.propManager is not None: # allow.extend( [ "PROPPATCH" ] ) @@ -1453,7 +1453,7 @@ def do_OPTIONS(self, environ, start_response): allow.extend(["HEAD", "GET", "PROPFIND"]) # if provider.propManager is not None: # allow.extend( [ "PROPFIND" ] ) - if not provider.isReadOnly(): + if not provider.is_readonly(): allow.extend(["PUT", "DELETE", "COPY", "MOVE", "PROPPATCH"]) # if provider.propManager is not None: # allow.extend( [ "PROPPATCH" ] ) @@ -1465,7 +1465,7 @@ def do_OPTIONS(self, environ, start_response): # A new resource below an existing collection # TODO: should we allow LOCK here? I think it is allowed to lock an # non-existing resource - if not provider.isReadOnly(): + if not provider.is_readonly(): allow.extend(["PUT", "MKCOL"]) else: self._fail(HTTP_NOT_FOUND)