-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Discussion: Is "fresh: true" the right name? #217
Comments
I have been feeling like a good option to consider would be to bust fresh mode apart into 2 different configuration options:
|
Initially reading this name, I thought it was describing the number of parallel messages being processed at once in a container. I like the idea of using this option as a way to ensure filesystems don't grow too large, while potentially giving developers the option to re-use files. I think we should probably keep planning around those options to the #210 ticket.
Since we no longer rely on a non-sudo user to restrict file system writes, I don't think we should go with Maybe we could go with |
👍 to this. I think the |
Per conversation, we should re-assess the naming of fresh mode since it doesn't get to the heart of the difference from a user's perspective. From a user's perspective, the default mode restricts writes to only volumes and the "fresh" mode allows users to write anywhere on the filesystem with a significant performance penalty.
With that in mind, should we rename
fresh
mode to one of these:unrestricted
sudo
slow
write_anywhere
cc/ @mapbox/platform-engine-room @emilymcafee @rclark for more ideas.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: