confused about implementation of 1-1, 1-n, n-1, n-n

[junkangwu]

hi, thanks a lot for your work in knowledge graph completion, but I still am confused about the implementation of the table4 in your paper.

1. as for the relation category, Following Wang et al. (2014), for each relation r, we compute the average number of tails per head (tphr) and the average number of head per tail (hptr). If tphr < 1.5 and hptr < 1.5, r is treated as one-to-one; if tphr ≥ 1.5 and hptr ≥ 1.5, r is treated as a many-to-many; if tphr < 1.5 and hptr ≥ 1.5, r is treated as one-to-many. So should we take the valid dataset and test dataset into consideration in this process? Or should we only classify them in the training dataset?
2. take tail prediction in the 1-n relation category as an example, should we choose all 1-n relations prediction scores and take all the results into mean?

I'm confused to re-implement this part of the experiment. It would be best if you could take a script as an example. Thanks a lot in advance!

[hitmancx]

The author seems to have confused the 1-n and n-1 data sets.