-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WEB-2903] fix: active cycle update payload #6270
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a modification to the date handling in the cycle creation and update process within the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Modal
participant DateFormatter
participant DateChecker
User->>Modal: Submit Cycle Form
Modal->>DateFormatter: Format start_date
DateFormatter-->>Modal: Formatted start_date
Modal->>DateFormatter: Format end_date
DateFormatter-->>Modal: Formatted end_date
Modal->>DateChecker: Validate Formatted Dates
DateChecker-->>Modal: Validation Result
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)web/core/components/cycles/modal.tsx (2)
Although using "date-fns" to format dates is a solid approach, please confirm whether local or UTC times are intended. Depending on the application's requirements, you may need to ensure consistent time zone handling across different user locales. ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more information about the date formatting usage in the codebase to better understand the time zone handling. Let me check how dates are handled in other parts of the codebase to understand if there's a consistent pattern or utility for timezone handling. Let me check the date utility files that were found to see if there are any standardized date handling patterns. Time zone handling is properly managed through utility functions The codebase has a robust date handling implementation that explicitly handles timezone concerns:
The current implementation is safe and follows best practices for handling dates in a timezone-aware manner. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Error: No shell scripts found Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for date-fns format usage in the file and surrounding context
rg "format\(" web/core/components/cycles/modal.tsx -B 2 -A 2
# Search for any date-fns related imports and usage
rg "date-fns" web/core/components/cycles/modal.tsx
# Look for any timezone related configurations or utilities
rg -i "timezone|utc|local time" web/core/components/cycles/modal.tsx
Length of output: 505 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for date-fns usage across the codebase to understand the pattern
rg "from 'date-fns'" -B 2 -A 2
# Look for any date utility files or helpers
fd -e ts -e js -e tsx date
# Search for any timezone configurations in the project
rg -i "timezone|utc" --type ts --type tsx --type js
Length of output: 2552 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check the contents of date utility files
cat packages/utils/src/datetime.ts web/helpers/date-time.helper.ts
# Look for date-fns format usage in the date utility files
rg "format\(" packages/utils/src/datetime.ts web/helpers/date-time.helper.ts -A 2 -B 2
# Check the specific component's date usage context
rg "dateChecker|start_date|end_date" web/core/components/cycles/modal.tsx -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 19652
If “payload.start_date” or “payload.end_date” could be strings or undefined, you may encounter runtime errors or unexpected results when calling “format”. Confirm that these values are valid Date objects or parse them accordingly. I can generate a script to search for other parts of the code where “start_date” or “end_date” might be assigned string values. Let me know if you would like me to do that. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Description
This PR resolves the issue with updating the active cycle. Previously, users were unable to update the active cycle due to a mismatch in the expected payload format. The start_date and end_date fields now updated in this YYYY-MM-DD format.
Type of Change
References
[WEB-2903]
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
New Features