Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use with authoryear? #24

Open
carbeck opened this issue Feb 11, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Use with authoryear? #24

carbeck opened this issue Feb 11, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@carbeck
Copy link

carbeck commented Feb 11, 2021

Hi,

I'm writing my thesis in the interference area between philology and historical linguistics (my primary thesis advisor is a linguist), so I decided to use biblatex-chicago for its authordate style for now (which seems to have some currency in linguistics publications AFAICT). However, I still need to cite the manuscripts I'm analyzing, and working around biblatex-chicago's limitations by putting the shelfmark in the title field of a @book entry doesn't always work as intended—in absence of an author definition it produces things like:

Erewhon, Library of Babel, Ms. 1234 Third quarter 13th century: fol. 1r-2v

Thus, your package would come in handy as a solution.

Your package extends the standard styles, and I'd be fine with reverting to authoryear, but verbose (and authortitle) seems to be hardcoded. It'd be nice if there were a way to change that, since citation by author/title is really unusual e.g. in linguistics.

@maieul
Copy link
Owner

maieul commented Feb 11, 2021 via email

@carbeck
Copy link
Author

carbeck commented Feb 11, 2021

Never mind, I think I figured out now how to combine the functionality of manuscripts with the citing and bibliography style of authoryear. MWE:

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{polyglossia}
\setdefaultlanguage{english}

\usepackage{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib}

@manuscript{vor:cod-276,
	title		= {Kaiserchronik},
	titleaddon	= {A},
	shorthand	= {A1},
	sorttitle	= {kc:A1},
	sortkey		= {kc:A01},

	location	= {Vorau},
	library		= {Stiftsarchiv des Augustiner Chorherrenstiftes},
	shortlibrary	= {StfA},
	shelfmark	= {StAV-Ms~276},
	dating		= {4th~quarter 12th~century},
	support		= {parchment},
	columns		= {2},
	pagination	= {folio},
	pages		= {1ra--73vb},
	doi		= {10.11588/diglit.29478},
}

@book{paul2007,
	author		= {Hermann Paul},
	editor		= {Thomas Klein and Hans-Joachim Solms and Klaus-Peter Wegera},
	editora		= {Ingeborg Schröbler and Heinz-Peter Prell},
	editoratype	= {collaborator},
	title		= {Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik},
	edition		= {25},
	series		= {Sammlung kurzer Grammatiken germanischer Dialekte, A. Hauptreihe},
	number		= {2},
	publisher	= {Niemeyer},
	location	= {Tübingen},
	date		= {2007},
	pagination	= {section},
}

\end{filecontents}

% Force 'manuscripts' to use authoryear for bibstyle
\usepackage[
    tools=manuscripts,
    bibstyle=authoryear,
]{biblatex-multiple-dm}

\usepackage[
    bibstyle=multiple-dm, % use the above
    citestyle=authoryear,
    backend=biber,
]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{\jobname.bib}

\begin{document}

\begin{itemize}
\item Text-citing \texttt{@manuscript}: \textcite[\ppno~10rb--11ra]{vor:cod-276}
\item Text-citing \texttt{@book}: \textcite[\pno~M~23]{paul2007}
\item Title-citing \texttt{@manuscript}: \citetitle{vor:cod-276}
\item Field-citing \texttt{@manuscript}:
    \citelist{vor:cod-276}{location},
    \citefield{vor:cod-276}{library},
    \citefield{vor:cod-276}{shelfmark}
\end{itemize}

\printshorthands[type=manuscript]
\printbibliography

\end{document}

Image of the output

If I replace authoryear with chicago-authordate—which is the style I've been using so far—LaTeX complains about the macros begentry, bbx:related, and bbx:url being undefined. This is probably due to incompatibilities between the standard bibliography styles and the biblatex-chicago package.

@maieul
Copy link
Owner

maieul commented Feb 11, 2021

Indeed. We could implement something to avoid such error (quite easy), but the best solution should be to see if there is equivalent in biblatex-chicago. I don't know.... and not so much time for this problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants