TailwindSort on save #15
-
|
I want to be able to run TailwindSort on save, but the sorting procedure is asynchronous so it's not guaranteed to resolve before the buffer is written. Not a big deal for me - so not ready to make a feature request - but would be nice if the api could easily handle it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
|
Yeah, I deliberately didn't add sort on save because of the asynchronous nature of the function, but I'm confused what kind of API do you want? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It's not that there's a kind of API that I want. I was wondering if there was a way to get this feature, despite the async nature of it, in a way that doesn't break the current API. The current API being the setup function with the options table. I should note that I'm only asking about this out of wishful thinking. Based on everything I know I would have also not added sort on save. I was just wondering if there was a worthwhile workaround that I didn't know. Simply put, I am satisfied with the way things work now because I think the alternative might either create a bad API or bad internal hacky code. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The problem with sorting on save is that we don't know how the users handle BufWrite events, do they use format on save? If so is it asynchronous or not? And in the case where both are async we need a callback API on one side, the default |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
The problem with sorting on save is that we don't know how the users handle BufWrite events, do they use format on save? If so is it asynchronous or not? And in the case where both are async we need a callback API on one side, the default
formatfunction from neovim doesn't provide a callback argument so I think it's resonable to a callback function on our side or add a sync version (I personally prefer async), but currently there's no way to do that if both are async.