Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

stepsize is unreasonable in some cases #2

Open
lsteinmann opened this issue Jun 3, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

stepsize is unreasonable in some cases #2

lsteinmann opened this issue Jun 3, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@lsteinmann
Copy link
Owner

In order to keep the data comparable, the interval (expressed as the stepsize-variable in the R-package) is chosen globally for all objects. There is currently no mode for resolving conflicts arising by misaligned dates, as e.g. a sequence from 3 to 26 would only yield one ‘step’ at 3, since 3+25 exceeds the range of the objects dating, as I am using seq().
Can I fix this somehow?

Options/Ideas:

  • assigning at least three steps, one for min, one for max, and one for mean; then filling the gaps with the stepsize interval if possible?
@lsteinmann lsteinmann self-assigned this Jun 3, 2020
@lsteinmann
Copy link
Owner Author

I did actually change it, I am - however - not entirely sure if this went very well. As of now it is creating a custom sequence in get.step.sequence() from the utilities file.

lsteinmann added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant