Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

composed checks #929

Closed
1 task done
rubvaz opened this issue Nov 16, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task done

composed checks #929

rubvaz opened this issue Nov 16, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
feature-request Request for new features to be added

Comments

@rubvaz
Copy link

rubvaz commented Nov 16, 2021

⚠️ Please verify that this feature request has NOT been suggested before.

  • I checked and didn't find similar feature request

🏷️ Feature Request Type

Other

🔖 Feature description

Some applications may need a composed check to have correct a proper operation

✔️ Solution

In my case we need that more than one check to have an application working, so if one of the checks is down all the composed check should be done.

❓ Alternatives

No response

📝 Additional Context

No response

@rubvaz rubvaz added the feature-request Request for new features to be added label Nov 16, 2021
@deefdragon
Copy link
Contributor

Are you referring to only marking something as up/down based on the combination of the statuses of a group of monitors? Or are you describing having a monitor know that it relies on another monitor, and if that monitor is down, automatically going down?

Regardless, going to reference #468 (216 specifically) as I think this is a duplicate, but if you have more details/believe its not a duplicate, feel free to expand on the problem.

@chakflying
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing as we now have support for group monitors (#2693). Specific issues with group monitors should be tracked elsewhere.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request Request for new features to be added
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants