Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for monitoring IBM DB2 databases #3370

Open
1 task done
jfcabral opened this issue Jul 6, 2023 · 2 comments
Open
1 task done

Add support for monitoring IBM DB2 databases #3370

jfcabral opened this issue Jul 6, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
area:monitor Everything related to monitors blocked-upstream upstream (i.e. a dependency we depend on will have to do this work) feature-request Request for new features to be added type:new proposing to add a new monitor

Comments

@jfcabral
Copy link

jfcabral commented Jul 6, 2023

⚠️ Please verify that this feature request has NOT been suggested before.

  • I checked and didn't find similar feature request

🏷️ Feature Request Type

New Monitor

🔖 Feature description

It would be great to also be able to monitor other DBs such as IBM DB2:

✔️ Solution

Replicate the setup for MS SQL server, but with different connection methods and parameters to connect and test DB2 instances.

❓ Alternatives

I'm currently using a TCP Port test, but this only checks if the port is open, not whether a DB is actually available on that port and properly functioning.

📝 Additional Context

One can easily run DB2 with Docker:

Its seems there's an NPM library for interfacing with DB2: https://www.npmjs.com/package/ibm_db

@jfcabral jfcabral added the feature-request Request for new features to be added label Jul 6, 2023
jfcabral added a commit to jfcabral/uptime-kuma that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2023
jfcabral added a commit to jfcabral/uptime-kuma that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2023
@CommanderStorm CommanderStorm added area:monitor Everything related to monitors type:new proposing to add a new monitor labels Dec 6, 2023
@jfcabral
Copy link
Author

Hi, @CommanderStorm, could you please comment on this: #3439 (comment)
Thank you

@CommanderStorm CommanderStorm added the blocked-upstream upstream (i.e. a dependency we depend on will have to do this work) label Feb 14, 2024
@CommanderStorm
Copy link
Collaborator

I replied there, but for this thread:
IBM currently does not support armv7/arm64.
Running on said platforms is a hard requirement for us which we will not drop for this feature.

If IBM changes their mind about arm support (or there is a way to have this work on arm too), this changes ^^

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:monitor Everything related to monitors blocked-upstream upstream (i.e. a dependency we depend on will have to do this work) feature-request Request for new features to be added type:new proposing to add a new monitor
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants