You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, it is possible to make exactly one vote only for one definition per language, either positive or negative. If there are multiple definitions, it is therefore not possible to cast votes for each defininition.
I understand this makes sense for positive votes, to indicate a preference.
But what if you think all definitions for a given language are bad? You have as well to choose one, while being neutral to all other definitions.
Plus, you can’t vote positive if you voted negative and vice-versa.
This voting system is weird.
Maybe the voting system should be rethought.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, it is possible to make exactly one vote only for one definition per language, either positive or negative. If there are multiple definitions, it is therefore not possible to cast votes for each defininition.
I understand this makes sense for positive votes, to indicate a preference.
But what if you think all definitions for a given language are bad? You have as well to choose one, while being neutral to all other definitions.
Plus, you can’t vote positive if you voted negative and vice-versa.
This voting system is weird.
Maybe the voting system should be rethought.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: