Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why .deb rather than source? #10

Open
drnic opened this issue Nov 19, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Why .deb rather than source? #10

drnic opened this issue Nov 19, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@drnic
Copy link

drnic commented Nov 19, 2015

By using the .deb the bosh release can only be used on Debian stemcells - source/nxlog-ce_2.9.1347_ubuntu_1404_amd64.deb

https://nxlog.org/products/nxlog-community-edition/download includes "Source code" option (albeit the version is older; wtf?)

@dpb587
Copy link
Contributor

dpb587 commented Nov 22, 2015

Unfortunately, yes.

@mrdavidlaing inquired about the missing 2.9 source tarball and the
response was they were working through some legal hurdles, but it would be
up soon. That was many months ago.

More recently, logstash (and so logsearch) dropped SSLv3 in favor of TLS.
Nxlog 2.8 doesn't support TLS, but 2.9 does.

For the short term, we decided to use the DEB so we could continue and
Ubuntu is the only environment we've been using. Can add other ones, if you
want to send a PR and the DEB download link.

For the long term, it'd be nice to just switch to using rsyslog which is
packaged in the stemcell. I haven't made time to do that and don't have
much experience with rsyslog config writing yet.

In the meantime, open to other ideas, too.

On Friday, November 20, 2015, Dr Nic Williams [email protected]
wrote:

By using the .deb the bosh release can only be used on Debian stemcells -
source/nxlog-ce_2.9.1347_ubuntu_1404_amd64.deb

https://nxlog.org/products/nxlog-community-edition/download includes
"Source code" option (albeit the version is older; wtf?)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#10.

Danny Berger
http://dpb587.me

@mrdavidlaing
Copy link
Member

FWIW, I think we should give up on NXLog; and switch to using the embedded rsyslog like most other bosh releases

@drnic
Copy link
Author

drnic commented Nov 26, 2015

If it's helpful I made a little simple-remote-syslog-boshrelease after I looked at this repo and nxlog boshrelease. I borrowed all of it from other releases; but perhaps it's a useful starting point for you?

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:01 AM, David Laing [email protected]
wrote:

FWIW, I think we should give up on NXLog; and switch to using the embedded rsyslog like most other bosh releases

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#10 (comment)

@mrdavidlaing
Copy link
Member

@drnic - found it - thanks!

https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/simple-remote-syslog-boshrelease

Out of interest, what are you using to forward logs to syslog?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants