Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(Question) VP vs VE Pre-trained model #18

Open
thibautissenhuth opened this issue Nov 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

(Question) VP vs VE Pre-trained model #18

thibautissenhuth opened this issue Nov 28, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@thibautissenhuth
Copy link

Hello,

Congrats for this nice work! It is much appreciated to be able to fine-tune a CM in 1 GPU-hour.

I have one question about the pre-trained model you rely on, and think I am missing something obvious. You use the model edm-cifar10-32x32-uncond-vp.pkl which corresponds to the training with Variance-Preserving process. However in your code, you use the Variance-Exploding process. Why don't you use the base model as edm-cifar10-32x32-uncond-ve.pkl ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant