Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sync: from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative #220

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative#451

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deepin-ci-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative#451
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

deepin pr auto review

根据提供的代码差异信息,我们可以看到两个文件 item_checked.dciitem_unchecked.dci 的二进制内容发生了变化。由于这些文件是二进制文件,通常用于存储图标或图像数据,因此无法直接进行语法和逻辑审查。不过,我们可以从文件名和文件类型推测一些可能的改进点:

  1. 文件命名

    • 文件名 item_checked.dciitem_unchecked.dci 表明这些文件可能用于表示某种状态(已选中或未选中)。文件名清晰明了,符合命名规范。
  2. 文件类型

    • .dci 文件扩展名可能表示某种特定的图标格式或数据压缩格式。如果这些文件是图标文件,建议检查是否有必要使用二进制格式,因为二进制文件通常比文本文件更难维护和调试。
  3. 文件内容

    • 由于文件内容是二进制数据,无法直接评估代码质量、性能或安全性。但是,如果这些文件是图标资源,建议确保图标设计符合品牌和用户体验标准。
  4. 版本控制

    • 如果这些文件是图标资源,建议在提交前进行版本控制,确保图标资源的一致性和可追溯性。
  5. 文件大小

    • 如果文件大小较大,建议检查是否有压缩或优化图标资源的空间,以减少文件大小和提高加载速度。

总结:

  • 对于二进制文件,无法直接进行语法和逻辑审查。
  • 建议检查文件命名和类型是否符合项目规范。
  • 如果文件是图标资源,建议确保图标设计符合品牌和用户体验标准。
  • 考虑文件大小,进行必要的压缩或优化。

如果这些文件是代码文件,请提供具体的代码内容以便进行详细的审查。

@deepin-bot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin-bot bot commented Jan 9, 2025

TAG Bot

New tag: 6.0.27
DISTRIBUTION: unstable
Suggest: synchronizing this PR through rebase #221

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant