Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Bump version to 6.5.9 #126

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rb-union
Copy link
Contributor

Bump version to 6.5.9

Log: Bump version to 6.5.9

Bump version to 6.5.9

Log: Bump version to 6.5.9
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rb-union

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

代码审查意见:

  1. 版本号更新

    • 在多个文件中(arm64/linglong.yamldebian/changeloglinglong.yamlloong64/linglong.yaml)都更新了版本号,这是一个好的做法,确保所有相关文件都同步更新版本号。
  2. changelog格式

    • debian/changelog文件中,新增的版本更新条目格式正确,但建议在描述部分添加更多细节,比如更新了哪些功能或修复了哪些问题,以便于维护者快速了解版本更新的内容。
  3. 文件索引和权限

    • loong64/linglong.yaml文件的索引和权限被修改,但未提供修改原因。如果这是有意为之,请确保修改后的权限和索引是合理的。如果文件权限被修改为100755,通常表示该文件是一个可执行文件,请确认这一点。
  4. 文件一致性

    • 所有相关文件(arm64/linglong.yamldebian/changeloglinglong.yamlloong64/linglong.yaml)都进行了版本更新,这表明文件的一致性得到了保证。
  5. 代码质量

    • 没有发现明显的代码质量问题,版本更新通常不会涉及到代码逻辑。
  6. 代码性能

    • 版本更新不会影响代码性能,因此没有性能相关的审查意见。
  7. 代码安全

    • 版本更新通常不会涉及到安全相关的代码,因此没有安全相关的审查意见。

总体来说,这次提交的版本更新是合理的,但建议在debian/changelog中添加更多的描述信息,以便于维护者更好地了解版本更新的内容。同时,确认loong64/linglong.yaml文件权限的修改是否合理。

Copy link

TAG Bot

TAG: 6.5.9
EXISTED: no
DISTRIBUTION: unstable

@rb-union
Copy link
Contributor Author

Duplicate

@rb-union rb-union closed this Dec 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants