Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: update changelog and version #280

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

pengfeixx
Copy link
Contributor

Update changelog and version

update changelog

Log:update changelog
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 20, 2024

TAG Bot

TAG: 6.0.14
EXISTED: no
DISTRIBUTION: unstable

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

这个提交的改动主要是更新了 Debian 包的版本号和变更日志。从代码审查的角度来看,这个提交没有明显的语法或逻辑错误。然而,有几个方面可以进一步改进:

  1. 版本号更新顺序:在提交信息中,版本号更新顺序不一致。在提交信息中,版本号从 6.0.13 更新到 6.0.14,但在变更日志中,版本号从 6.0.13 更新到 6.0.13。这可能会导致混淆。建议在提交信息中保持版本号更新的一致性。

  2. 提交信息格式:提交信息中的格式可以更加规范和一致。例如,可以统一使用 * chore: 来描述非功能性的更改,或者使用 * feat: 来描述新功能。此外,提交信息应该简洁明了,避免冗长的描述。

  3. 变更日志格式:变更日志中的条目应该按照时间顺序排列,并且每个条目都应该有一个简短的描述。在这个提交中,变更日志的条目顺序是正确的,但是描述应该更加详细,以便其他开发者能够快速了解更改的内容。

  4. 签名和日期:提交信息中的签名和日期格式应该保持一致。在这个提交中,签名和日期格式是正确的,但是可以进一步改进,例如使用统一的日期格式(例如 YYYY-MM-DD)。

综上所述,这个提交的改动主要是更新了 Debian 包的版本号和变更日志。虽然改动本身没有明显的语法或逻辑错误,但是可以通过改进提交信息和变更日志的格式来提高代码质量和可读性。

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lzwind, pengfeixx

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@pengfeixx pengfeixx merged commit 7021047 into linuxdeepin:master Dec 20, 2024
15 checks passed
@pengfeixx pengfeixx deleted the update-changelog-20241220 branch December 20, 2024 05:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants