You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We need to offer users a way of citing the website and data. There needs to be some way of fairly deciding who is to be named as a contributor to each study on the site. I will propose something here soon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The most logical way to do this is to work with "editorial roles", as
they do in the biblatex specification which is incredibly useful for the
complex things we are dealing with when creating linguistic data in
collaborative projects.
They make a distinctoin between different roles (founder, translator,
compiler, etc.), and also allow for customization. I think you should
define the different degree of who performed in which role, and put
their names on accordingly.
See
http://ctan.sharelatex.com/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex/doc/biblatex.pdf
for details, page 34ff
We do this also in LingPy now, where all former contributors who did not
work for the next release are given the role of "contributor":
http://lingpy.org
Within Sound Comparison there is a lot of complexity, but I have a system worked out and agreed with other major contributors, and it can now be implemented on the site.
We need to offer users a way of citing the website and data. There needs to be some way of fairly deciding who is to be named as a contributor to each study on the site. I will propose something here soon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: