Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support multiple zarr backends + abstraction #15

Open
balbasty opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Support multiple zarr backends + abstraction #15

balbasty opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@balbasty
Copy link
Collaborator

I feel like it would be good to have an option to switch between zarr/zarrita/tensorstore for the zarr i/o, as they all have pros and cons and this would enable benchmarking each of them.

The most useful think would probably to abstract away the few features that we actually use (opening/writing a group, opening/writing/slicing an array), and wrap each of the libraries in classes that inherit from this AbstractZarrIO class.

@balbasty balbasty added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 12, 2024
@kabilar
Copy link
Member

kabilar commented Jan 10, 2025

Just noting that zarr-python version 3 was released yesterday.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants