diff --git a/_quarto.yml b/_quarto.yml index f1fa695..cb86230 100644 --- a/_quarto.yml +++ b/_quarto.yml @@ -38,8 +38,6 @@ website: title: "LibScie Handbook" collapse-below: lg left: - - text: "Home" - href: index.qmd - text: "Quick links" menu: - href: "https://libscie.org" @@ -48,9 +46,6 @@ website: text: "Blog editor" - href: "https://mngr.libscie.org" text: "LibScie Manager" - - href: "https://researchequals.com" - text: "ResearchEquals" - - text: "Getting started" menu: - href: "onboarding/discord.qmd" @@ -60,6 +55,7 @@ website: menu: - href: "culture/document.qmd" - href: "culture/jobs.qmd" + - href: "culture/values.qmd" - href: "culture/workweek.qmd" - text: "Policies" menu: @@ -67,12 +63,9 @@ website: - href: "policies/events.qmd" - href: "policies/equipment.qmd" - href: "policies/wages.qmd" - - - text: "Help" + - text: "ResearchEquals" menu: - - text: "Report a Bug" - icon: "bug" - href: "https://github.com/libscie/policy/issues" + - href: "researchequals/cohorts.qmd" tools: - icon: github href: https://github.com/libscie diff --git a/culture/values.qmd b/culture/values.qmd new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3829ca8 --- /dev/null +++ b/culture/values.qmd @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +# Values + +We value a lot of things in our organization, and we do our best to be explicit about them, so that you know what you can expect. + +Our values are formulated in "X over Y" formats. This helps us highlight our own value and also what we actively avoid. This has (anecdotally) proven to make the values more informative in our everyday operations. + + + +## Consent over paternalism + +We believe in personal autonomy and consent. This means that we respect boundaries, but we cannot articulate your boundaries for you. Every one of us needs to put in the work to articulate what we need, want, and desire in our work (and this is hard). It also means you are responsible for your (in)action. + +## Done over perfect + +We operate under "good enough management." This means that goalposts need to be clear, time investments realistic, and clarity of what being done means. + +## Clarity over ambiguity + +Sometimes it is better to make a suboptimal decision now and deal with the outcomes, than to keep mulling the decision over indefinitely. We can start with concrete outcomes, but not with ambiguous possibilities. + +## Explicit over implicit + +Communication is key to ensuring a shared understanding of what we do. When we make things explicit, we can see whether we really had a shared understanding. Explicit communication is also fertile ground for discourse. Being explicit is the compost from which we grow. + + + +## Considerate over inattentive + +We all have things happening in our lives. To create a culture of understanding and learning, empathy and consideration of other people's positions is important. It helps us understand their decisions, and to provide for them. W + + +- Support + - We have a support mindset with each other. If we cannot provide support, we say so. +- Considerate diff --git a/researchequals/cohorts.qmd b/researchequals/cohorts.qmd new file mode 100644 index 0000000..db46d65 --- /dev/null +++ b/researchequals/cohorts.qmd @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ +# ResearchEquals Cohorts + +:::{.callout-tip} +We regularly run cohorts - [check out our Tito page](https://ti.to/libscie) to see when and get your spot! +::: + +This is the instructor guide for our ResearchEquals Cohorts. We iterate over create - so here's all you need right now to get started and run your own cohort, in case you want. + +
+ Cohort onboarding + +- Welcome [00:00 - 00:15] + - Welcome on this journey of publishing your research differently [00:00 - 00:03] + - We will be discovering how to publish your research differently, and how to curate research differently. + - This is a safe space to learn, so I encourage questions and feedback, no matter how obvious it might feel. + - This session will be recorded! 🔴 + - Short intro instructor [00:03-00:05] + - I’m Chris Hartgerink, founder of ResearchEquals and a researcher myself. I did my PhD in statistics, and am happy to now be working on sustainable alternatives in research that make our lives easier. + - ResearchEquals is one such project and I am thankful that you lot are making the time to join here! +- Goals [00:05 - 00:07] + - The goal of the cohort is provide a safe learning environment around modular publishing. What is it? Why is it? How does it work? + - Together we’ll learn how to publish the research process instead of the results alone + - We’re also here, together, to create connection and community, so we don’t have to go at it alone. +- Code of Conduct [00:07 - 00:10 - Vinodh Ilangovan] +- Structure [00:10 - 00:15] + - Mon - Thu + - Meet in Zoom + - Chat in Discord + - There may be additional materials before the cohort calls for you to go through, which we’ll always keep time effective. + - At the end of the cohort, everybody who completed the course will receive a digital certificate. +- Short introductions [00:15 - 00:30 - Chris] + - Getting the hang of whiteboards + - Where is everyone from + - Introduce yourself + - ~2min each + - Who are you + - Research interest + - What’s your guilty pleasure + - Others make sticky notes + - To make an account on ResearchEquals if they haven’t already + - Getting the hang of Discord [00:30 - 00:35 - Chris] +- Closing + - On Thursday, same time, we will discuss modules in-depth, and + +
+ +
+ Why and what are modules? + +- Welcome + - [Icebreaker] + - Recap + - In our first call, we got to know each other a bit. + - For this call, you prepared by watching a short video on the idea of publishing the research process. You learned about selective publishing, and how altering predictions based on results may be a result from the article format. + - You now know that research modules are comparable to research steps. + - Today's goal: Understand single modules and what goes into a module. +- Do you feel like published research in your field showcases the way research is actually done? + - Where could it improve? +- What research steps are often overlooked in your field? +- Demo ResearchEquals +- Exercise + - [ ] Think about your most recent research project. What is the latest step you took? What are the outputs/files you created from this? + - [ ] Create your own draft module + - [ ] Go through the module types - are there any steps you are already missing? +- Reportback from exercise + - What's your first impressions of research modules? +- Recap of today + - We learned how to create our first module, and what has to be included for each module. + - We also learned what optional information +- Today we learned about individual steps in the research process. + - Next time we'll talk more about how those steps combine into an entire research journey. + - For the next call, take a few minutes to write down the steps involved in your research. +
+ +
+ Deconstructing your research + +- What's the added value in knowing the journey? + +
+ + +
+ Publishing your first module + + +
+ +
+ Kind collaboration + + +
+ + +
+ Curating research + + +
+ +
+ Cohort graduation + + +
+ + +## Visibility + +## Portfolio + +## Kind collaboration + +## Collection + +## Graduation + +## Icebreaker questions + +- What is one of your guilty pleasures? +- What movie have you seen multiple times? +- What is a classic movie you only saw until much later? +- \ No newline at end of file