You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, for tracepoints such as reaction_starts and reaction_ends, the reaction index is passed to the dst_id field of the tracerecord. This is a little inconsistent and the better approach would be to add a new field to the trace record called reaction_idx.
This would likely also need changes in the various trace_to_X utilities and fedsd and other external trace plugins.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One goal in this design is to fit as many trace points as possible into an in-memory buffer. I suggest instead changing the name of the field rather than increasing the footprint of each record.
Currently, for tracepoints such as
reaction_starts
andreaction_ends
, the reaction index is passed to thedst_id
field of the tracerecord. This is a little inconsistent and the better approach would be to add a new field to the trace record calledreaction_idx
.This would likely also need changes in the various
trace_to_X
utilities andfedsd
and other external trace plugins.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: