You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear @MassimoCimmino, I was wondering whether the fluid within the system but outside the boreholes is accounted for in the borefield's capacity. Specifically, I am referring to the fluid in the connecting pipes between multiple boreholes, which, according to Xu & Spitler (2006), can contribute up to a factor of 2 of the fluid volume.
I calculated the fluid volume of a pipe segment using the segment length and cross-section:
The fluid volume of a pipe segment I found to be calculated based on the pipe segment length and cross-section: VTubSeg=hSegModelica.Constants.pi(borFieDat.conDat.rTub - borFieDat.conDat.eTub)^2. Is the additional fluid in the connecting pipes considered elsewhere in the model?
I appreciate your clarification.
Best regards,
Lone Meertens
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@LoneMeertens - No, there is no pipe before or after the boreholes in the models (Buildings.Fluid.Geothermal.Borefields). The models only represent the boreholes. Pipes (buried or not) should be modelled separately.
Dear @MassimoCimmino, I was wondering whether the fluid within the system but outside the boreholes is accounted for in the borefield's capacity. Specifically, I am referring to the fluid in the connecting pipes between multiple boreholes, which, according to Xu & Spitler (2006), can contribute up to a factor of 2 of the fluid volume.
I calculated the fluid volume of a pipe segment using the segment length and cross-section:
The fluid volume of a pipe segment I found to be calculated based on the pipe segment length and cross-section: VTubSeg=hSegModelica.Constants.pi(borFieDat.conDat.rTub - borFieDat.conDat.eTub)^2. Is the additional fluid in the connecting pipes considered elsewhere in the model?
I appreciate your clarification.
Best regards,
Lone Meertens
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: