Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fluid inside geothermal system but outside boreholes taken into account? #4121

Open
LoneMeertens opened this issue Feb 24, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@LoneMeertens
Copy link

Dear @MassimoCimmino, I was wondering whether the fluid within the system but outside the boreholes is accounted for in the borefield's capacity. Specifically, I am referring to the fluid in the connecting pipes between multiple boreholes, which, according to Xu & Spitler (2006), can contribute up to a factor of 2 of the fluid volume.

I calculated the fluid volume of a pipe segment using the segment length and cross-section:

The fluid volume of a pipe segment I found to be calculated based on the pipe segment length and cross-section: VTubSeg=hSegModelica.Constants.pi(borFieDat.conDat.rTub - borFieDat.conDat.eTub)^2. Is the additional fluid in the connecting pipes considered elsewhere in the model?

I appreciate your clarification.

Best regards,
Lone Meertens

@MassimoCimmino
Copy link
Contributor

@LoneMeertens - No, there is no pipe before or after the boreholes in the models (Buildings.Fluid.Geothermal.Borefields). The models only represent the boreholes. Pipes (buried or not) should be modelled separately.

@LoneMeertens
Copy link
Author

@MassimoCimmino - Thank you for the quick response and clear explanation!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants