Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Configuration] Enhance Import Modal UX #9973

Open
theBeginner86 opened this issue Jan 15, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by layer5io/sistent#727
Open

[Configuration] Enhance Import Modal UX #9973

theBeginner86 opened this issue Jan 15, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by layer5io/sistent#727
Labels
issue/willfix This issue will be worked on kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature

Comments

@theBeginner86
Copy link
Member

Current Behavior

Currently, the import modal for configurations like Designs, preselect the source type to Meshery Design. This makes it easy for the users to miss out selecting their preferred source type considering they are using some other source type like K8s Manifest, Docker Compose, Helm Chart etc.

Desired Behavior

Enhance the import model RJSF Schema so that by default none is selected (or empty selection) as users are prompted so choose one.
This would not only improve the UX but would prevent users from shooting themselves into the foot, considering they are uploading K8s Manifest but the source type preselect is Meshery Design.

Implementation

Acceptance Tests

Mockups


Contributor Guides and Handbook

Copy link

stale bot commented Feb 24, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Feb 24, 2024
Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 7, 2024

This issue is being automatically closed due to inactivity. However, you may choose to reopen this issue.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Mar 7, 2024
@sudhanshutech sudhanshutech reopened this Mar 7, 2024
@stale stale bot removed the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Mar 7, 2024
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 23, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Apr 23, 2024
@Yashsharma1911 Yashsharma1911 added issue/willfix This issue will be worked on and removed issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time labels Apr 23, 2024
@sudhanshutech sudhanshutech linked a pull request Aug 31, 2024 that will close this issue
1 task
@Yashsharma1911 Yashsharma1911 removed their assignment Sep 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
issue/willfix This issue will be worked on kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants