You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We could use a hyperbracketed operation to check that several given values match the same match pattern and that their components are related according to some given comparison functions:
(taffy-match-related? (list a b c) `(cons ,free-identifier=? (cons ,< ,(lambda_#t))))
This could also have multiple hyperbracketed parts representing different match clauses to try. All the inputs must match the same clause for it to count as a successful match.
It might be better to call this taffy-match=? since it'll tend to be an equivalence check if the interpolated comparisons are equivalence checks.
If there's only one match clause, it also might be better to call this taffy-match-and? or taffy-match-zip-and? since it's a conjunction of the interpolated comparisons. However, if there's more than one match clause, it has some or semantics to it as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We could use a hyperbracketed operation to check that several given values match the same match pattern and that their components are related according to some given comparison functions:
This could also have multiple hyperbracketed parts representing different
match
clauses to try. All the inputs must match the same clause for it to count as a successful match.It might be better to call this
taffy-match=?
since it'll tend to be an equivalence check if the interpolated comparisons are equivalence checks.If there's only one
match
clause, it also might be better to call thistaffy-match-and?
ortaffy-match-zip-and?
since it's a conjunction of the interpolated comparisons. However, if there's more than onematch
clause, it has someor
semantics to it as well.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: