Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

LIGHT + does not eintail to be not a complement (complex-predicates-include.tex) #229

Open
stefan11 opened this issue Sep 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

LIGHT + does not eintail to be not a complement (complex-predicates-include.tex) #229

stefan11 opened this issue Sep 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@stefan11
Labels
content
Milestone
V3

Comments

@stefan11
Copy link
Contributor

stefan11 commented Sep 7, 2024 •
edited
Loading

grafik

I think this claim is wrong. To exclude this, the NON-HEAD-DTR in head comps structures would have to be LEX–. This is how it is done in Berligram/CoreGram.
@stefan11 stefan11 self-assigned this Sep 7, 2024
@stefan11 stefan11 added this to the V2 milestone Sep 7, 2024
@stefan11 stefan11 modified the milestones: V2, V3 Oct 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@stefan11 stefan11

Labels
content
Projects
None yet
Milestone
V3
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@stefan11