-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Search is much better on the UI than in the open-source package #1708
Comments
Search on the UI is good: https://lamin.ai/laminlabs/cellxgene/bionty/celltype The question is whether we want to somehow wire the "good search endpoint" into lamindb in case somebody runs on a deployed instance. 🤔 |
And why is it so? |
Also see laminlabs/bionty#98 (comment) |
The rapid fuzz search on the public ontology seems to be reasonable here except for the two last automated labels: {
'Dendritic cells': 'dendritic cell',
'CD19+ B': 'B cell, CD19-positive',
'CD4+/CD45RO+ Memory': 'effector memory CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell, terminally differentiated',
'CD8+ Cytotoxic T': 'cytotoxic T cell',
'CD4+/CD25 T Reg': 'CD8-positive, CD25-positive, alpha-beta regulatory T cell',
'CD14+ Monocytes': 'CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte',
'CD56+ NK': 'CD16-positive, CD56-dim natural killer cell, human',
'CD8+/CD45RA+ Naive Cytotoxic': 'CD38-positive naive B cell',
'CD34+': 'CD38-high pre-BCR positive cell'
} Source https://docs.lamin.ai/scrna2 It's also a good test case. |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: