Remove the reduntant FIFO implementation #575
Labels
good first issue
Good for newcomers
nice to have
Could be useful, but not a top priority
refactor
Doesn't change functionality, but makes stuff nicer
Currently we have two transactron-friendly implementation of FIFO:
BasicFifo
andFIFO
. It is unlikely that we need two of them, so we can get rid ofFIFO
, as it doesn't not support flushing the queue.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: