Inconsistent documentation about featuregate ComponentSLIs

[T-Lakshmi]

This is a Bug Report
Problem:
ComponentSLIs feature-gate state mentioned as stable since V1.29 under Kubernetes Component SLI Metrics.

But under feature-gate list its still mentaion as Beta state.

Proposed Solution:
Update the docs with accurate information.

[T-Lakshmi]

/sig docs
/language en

[T-Lakshmi]

From the code comments its mentioned ComponentSLIs officially graduated to GA in v1.29 but the gate was not updated until v1.32.

https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/a27498ef42f27e7cddadb2c5b31bc80fed81d964/staging/src/k8s.io/component-base/metrics/features/kube_features.go#L35

ComponentSLIs: {
{Version: version.MustParse("1.26"), Default: false, PreRelease: featuregate.Alpha},
{Version: version.MustParse("1.27"), Default: true, PreRelease: featuregate.Beta},
// ComponentSLIs officially graduated to GA in v1.29 but the gate was not updated until v1.32.
// To support emulated versions, keep the gate until v1.35.
{Version: version.MustParse("1.32"), Default: true, PreRelease: featuregate.GA, LockToDefault: true},
},

[T-Lakshmi]

https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/a27498ef42f27e7cddadb2c5b31bc80fed81d964/test/featuregates_linter/test_data/versioned_feature_list.yaml#L209

- name: ComponentSLIs
  versionedSpecs:
  - default: false
    lockToDefault: false
    preRelease: Alpha
    version: "1.26"
  - default: true
    lockToDefault: false
    preRelease: Beta
    version: "1.27"
  - default: true
    lockToDefault: true
    preRelease: GA
    version: "1.32"

[sftim]

We haven't released v1.32 yet

The docs look correct for v1.31 - which part is not right @T-Lakshmi ?

[sftim]

/priority awaiting-more-evidence

[T-Lakshmi]

@sftim,

The docs look correct for v1.31 - which part is not right @T-Lakshmi ?

ComponentSLIs feature-gate state mentioned as stable since V1.29 under Kubernetes Component SLI Metrics.

Is this true? is ComponentSLIs feature state stable for V1.31?

[sftim]

Ah that's the bit. Yes, it's not stable. The shortcode must be defined wrong.

/remove-priority awaiting-more-evidence
/triage accepted

@T-Lakshmi you are welcome to file a PR; if you don't plan to, please use /help to label this as help wanted.
Or (extra credit) add the information into the PR description to make this a good first issue.

[T-Lakshmi]

@sftim,
Ok, i can file PR for this.

/assign

[T-Lakshmi]

PR Raised: #48964