-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 763
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change label names, get rid of dashes. #1881
Comments
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close not-planned |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned". In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What would you like to be added?
Our labels are a bit of a mess at the moment as they do not follow a simple convention.
It should be: kompose....
For example, this is good: kompose.service.healthcheck.readiness.test
However, this is something that needs to be changed:
kompose.service.expose.tls-secret
should bekompose.service.tls-secret.expose
since it follows the type, second type, action scenario.The following labels should be changed:
Why is this needed?
FYI This MUST be backwards compatible. We should add these updates to the label, but also adhere to the old labels (in case people have been using them)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: