Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is metabolome annotation required for module ID? #10

Open
eterlova opened this issue Mar 22, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Is metabolome annotation required for module ID? #10

eterlova opened this issue Mar 22, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@eterlova
Copy link

Hello,

First, thanks for creating MoDentify! It looks like an amazing tool and I am excited to use it!

I have a dataset (basically peak intensity matrix) for a non-model species. Since it is non-model, annotation of my data is even more difficult than it usually is in metabolomics. My idea was to first find the modules of metabolites, and only then to attempt the annotation of my peaks.

Am I right that MoDentify requires an annotation file for identification of modules in my data even on the level of individual metabolites?

@Livia-Rasp
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello!

I think in your case it would be ok, if you just use a data.table or data.frame with just the column name as annotations. As names you could use some identifier of your peaks.
The annotation data.table is only really important, if you want to generate networks at the pathway level.

Also one additional thing. If you're using the visualization functions of our package, which uses Cytoscape, attributes from the annotation table, will also be in Cytoscape. So depending on that you could decide on putting some additional attributes into this table.

Don't hesitate to ask, if you have any further questions.

Best,
David

@eterlova
Copy link
Author

Hi David,

Thanks for the reply, these are great news! I will try a nearly-empty annotation file.

Best,
Lisa

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants