You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First, thanks for creating MoDentify! It looks like an amazing tool and I am excited to use it!
I have a dataset (basically peak intensity matrix) for a non-model species. Since it is non-model, annotation of my data is even more difficult than it usually is in metabolomics. My idea was to first find the modules of metabolites, and only then to attempt the annotation of my peaks.
Am I right that MoDentify requires an annotation file for identification of modules in my data even on the level of individual metabolites?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think in your case it would be ok, if you just use a data.table or data.frame with just the column name as annotations. As names you could use some identifier of your peaks.
The annotation data.table is only really important, if you want to generate networks at the pathway level.
Also one additional thing. If you're using the visualization functions of our package, which uses Cytoscape, attributes from the annotation table, will also be in Cytoscape. So depending on that you could decide on putting some additional attributes into this table.
Don't hesitate to ask, if you have any further questions.
Hello,
First, thanks for creating MoDentify! It looks like an amazing tool and I am excited to use it!
I have a dataset (basically peak intensity matrix) for a non-model species. Since it is non-model, annotation of my data is even more difficult than it usually is in metabolomics. My idea was to first find the modules of metabolites, and only then to attempt the annotation of my peaks.
Am I right that MoDentify requires an annotation file for identification of modules in my data even on the level of individual metabolites?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: