-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Client Mode #121
Comments
Not sure what do you mean by client mode. But sure, sip.js can send requests. For example examples/make_call.js makes a bogus call. |
thanks kirill, will check it out.
yes i want to create call scenarios for testing and benchmarking
…On Jun 16, 2017 2:41 AM, "Kirill Mikhailov" ***@***.***> wrote:
Not sure what do you mean by client mode. But of sure, sip.js can send
requests. For example examples/make_call.js makes a bogus call.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#121 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGxwWGyR4A-XgqXQXoZ-5ygt3i3l4KNdks5sEXrMgaJpZM4N4ro7>
.
|
kirill, i would like to suggest a way for developer to use random ports. sip.start(options, callback) - options should have port : 0 where sip stack will try to bind to a random port and if it used, try another one for a few times, then error out when not available. if i'm not mistaken, socket.bind() already support this, only thing we need to do is make sure we don't call defaultPort() but rather, refer to the current bound port. is my understanding correct? |
pull request for this |
hi kirill, any reservations on this PR? i am trying to create multiple instances on a single host and this is blocking |
I am looking for a SIPP alternative, thought I could use this as a better testing tool.
is client mode supported? i am willing to help out if not
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: