You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Many (email) clients have some support for GNUpg (e.g., astroid). While some may allow complex configuration sufficient to hand-code swapping in keys-pub, for some the integration is hard-coded. In these cases, it'd be useful to have a wrapper script that mocks GNUpg for signing, verification, decryption, and encryption.
Arguments for providing a utility script, and including it in the keys-pub/keys (or, possibly, keys-pub/keys-ext) are:
it would facilitate user migration from pgp, particularly in the case of users who are not programmers.
it would ensure a more correct implementation, as it would be a 1-time implementation, rather than N-times.
it would ensure compatibility between clients, since options would be consistent between clients
I'm willing to provide a pull request, but I believe the resulting code would be best hosted in the canonical repo, and having input from users of other email clients would help nail a more robust implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That would certainly be cleaner and easier for most people than installing another utility wrapper. Can we handle cases where the only configurable option is what the binary is called, or would that be too invasive? Like, checking if os.Args[0] was keysgpg and (internally) calling the gpg mock function? In extreme cases, where users can only tell the mail client where the GPG executable is, they could at least symlink keys to keysgpg and then configure the executable to that.
Many (email) clients have some support for GNUpg (e.g., astroid). While some may allow complex configuration sufficient to hand-code swapping in
keys-pub
, for some the integration is hard-coded. In these cases, it'd be useful to have a wrapper script that mocks GNUpg for signing, verification, decryption, and encryption.Arguments for providing a utility script, and including it in the
keys-pub/keys
(or, possibly,keys-pub/keys-ext
) are:I'm willing to provide a pull request, but I believe the resulting code would be best hosted in the canonical repo, and having input from users of other email clients would help nail a more robust implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: