-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
Webhook no longer working #161
Comments
Can you share your Docker compose file? |
|
thanks, can you also validate with http? |
Validate if the webhook works over http? |
exactly |
See what I can do, need to just play with my traefik config... |
thanks ;) |
No HTTP didn't make a difference, still nothing Also having an issue if I try to use MQTT instead, whenever I configure MQTT the camera stream entirely stops working. (using https://www.cloudmqtt.com/) |
Interesting can you share the logs, will try to reproduce myself. |
in the log.stash the only relevant part seems to be
|
ok will have a look ;) |
Doesn't seem to be anything related to the MQTT issue, once configured the logs never get past
Before looping back to...
|
having a look as well. |
just checked Webhook, indeed it is not longer working anymore. Trying to update the dependency and rebuilding the docker image |
MQTT works fine on my side so not sure. Can you check once more? |
Does MQTT work when entering a domain name? looking at the docs an IP address is used and the type is "number". I need to use a qualified domain
|
Hmm. That could be the reason indeed (I tried a IP address). Could you have a look into the MQTT class as well?
https://github.com/kerberos-io/machinery/blob/master/src/kerberos/machinery/io/IoMQTT.cpp <https://github.com/kerberos-io/machinery/blob/master/src/kerberos/machinery/io/IoMQTT.cpp>
… On 23 Apr 2020, at 15:03, Carl Jackson ***@***.***> wrote:
Does MQTT work when entering a domain name? looking at the docs an IP address is used and the type is "number". I need to use a qualified domain
<server type="number">127.0.0.1</server>
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#161 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALZUG37AZVW5PAZBMVYRSTROA4D7ANCNFSM4MO36PVA>.
|
C++ isn't my thing at all but I think changing line 10
to this
and the XML type changing to Is all that is needed, pretty sure that would be a breaking change for everyones config though unfortunately. |
@cwjackso can you pull again kerberos/kerberos, we rebuilded the image. The webhook should be fixed. let us know. |
Yes - web hook working 👍 |
Describe the bug
I am no longer seeing webhooks on camera motion. Video recording is working fine.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
A webhook is received, or at least a useful error to say why it is failing
This is using the latest docker image via docker-compose and the same config as was working on the previous docker image. the address I am posting to is https are there maybe missing certificates in the new image?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: