-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 198
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactoring documentation #992
Comments
hi @vlcinsky , thank you for your suggestions. https://diataxis.fr/ looks very cool. I am the main person responsible for the (lack of) documentation, and I am currently working (slowly) on improving it, so I appreciate particularly your candor. Feel free to help us if you want to , and if you haven't already, please join our #kapitan channel on the kubernetes slack. Also, just to let you know we are meeting tomorrow at 12:00 UK time for the monthly Kapitan Working Group, feel free to join if you want to (details on the slack channel) |
@ademariag I am interested in joining the Kubernetes Slack - for this I will probably need an invitation. My e-mail address is [email protected] or I can use my private one, [email protected] which I have bound to my GitHub account vlcinsky. |
I have invited you on [email protected] |
@vlcinsky did some work towards your suggestions. Let me know what you think |
Hi @ademariag Regarding invitation to Slack - it is not working for me:
Regarding After reshuffling top menu items: it looks better now. Anyway, there are still a few things which seem to me worth to improve. I would be glad to:
|
Hi @vlcinsky Also try this: https://kubernetes.slack.com/signup#/domain-signup once you are in we can discuss what to do, but yes any help is welcome |
@ademariag all my attempts to join the kubernetes.slack.com are failing.
I would propose to try Zoom, if you send me contact e-mail to [email protected], I would provide you with a Zoom invite. Possible time to meet are:
|
I know, kapitan is a tool of great value. At the same time, I continually struggle with Kapitan's documentation. And I am sure, it harms wider adoption of the tool.
Problematic aspects of existing documentation
The structure is confusing
On https://kapitan.dev/ I see following top level menu items:
Regarding the order - it often feels wierd:
Some topics are missing or incorrect or incomplete
Just two examples:
Proposed approach for refactoring
Current Kapitan shows, that real focus and effort go to the product itself but the documentation is lacking priority in development process.
I would propose following approach:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: