-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
Haarolean
May 3, 2024
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hi, that's absolutely okay to compare the older versions of the app. From the UX perspective, that's a better approach to show the user that there is an action (but not an available one) rather than not showing anything at all. While this might be not that revelant to read-only mode, it's rather preferrable with RBAC. So, it's quite intended, as managing both the states for r/o and RBAC modes for the every button in the app is quite cumbersome. Let me know what you think. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Answer selected by
Haarolean
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi, that's absolutely okay to compare the older versions of the app.
From the UX perspective, that's a better approach to show the user that there is an action (but not an available one) rather than not showing anything at all. While this might be not that revelant to read-only mode, it's rather preferrable with RBAC.
So, it's quite intended, as managing both the states for r/o and RBAC modes for the every button in the app is quite cumbersome.
Let me know what you think.