Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Results with custom MSA are different and misfolded compared to the result from --use_msa_server #145

Open
kartik-rallapalli opened this issue Jan 8, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@kartik-rallapalli
Copy link

I am trying to fold a protein+RNA structure and while the predict fold is correct in case of the server generated MSAs (screenshot with green ribbons)(
Screenshot 2025-01-08 at 12 02 00 PM
), when I try to predict the same complex with a custom MSA the RNA fold seems distorted(orange in the screenshot
Screenshot 2025-01-08 at 12 05 06 PM
). Intriguingly, the custom MSA used in this case is the output generated from the --use-msa-server. Has anyone encountered/resolved such a issue yet? Thank you!

@wehs7661
Copy link

Sorry I am not sure how to resolve this issue but I wonder what MSA file you used from the case where --use-msa-server. Did you use bfd*.a3m or uniref.a3m in the output msa folder? Thanks a lot!

@kartik-rallapalli
Copy link
Author

Thanks for taking a look at this issue. I used the uniref.a3m file! I believe that there is something in the way last line of any custom msa input file is processed (line 4459 in the screenshot below).

Image

Along these lines, are the custom MSA required to have the uniref fasta IDs? Do these MSA homologs help decide the pdb templates like in Alphafold?

Thanks again for creating this repo and sharing the amazing work!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants