Builtin Valuetypes #406
Merged
Builtin Valuetypes #406
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
georg-schwarz
force-pushed
the
builtin-valuetypes
branch
from
957c9dd
to
8b28981
Compare
|
|
georg-schwarz
force-pushed
the
builtin-valuetypes
branch
2 times, most recently
from
1d8b7ab
to
b3bba94
Compare
georg-schwarz
force-pushed
the
builtin-valuetypes
branch
from
b3bba94
to
eb77b82
Compare
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Introduces
builtin valuetypes to the language (replaces former keywords).Not sure if we really need this, it was majorly for me learning on the job for the builtin blocks. However, users can now click on the builtin valuetypes like
text,decimal,integer, andbooleanand see their definition in VSCode. This would allow better in-code documentation as we can add comments on the behavior of the builting valuetypes in the standard library.Screencast.from.07-21-2023.02.53.56.PM.webm
Let me know what you think! If you think it is useful I'd introduce some comments to the builtin valuetypes.