You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This was previously discussed in #1363 and I think the new treatment of ErrorCollector. checkSucceeds() is correct. However ErrorCollector.addError() is more commonly used when calling sub-methods or in wrapper Rules (AOSP example) so it seems clearer (to me) to pass assumption failures through.
#1702 is potential fix, although this has similar properties to what #1363 complained about, i.e. if addError() is used to add multiple assumption failures then they'll get re-thrown as a MultipleFailureException causing the test to fail. It seems to me that in that case the test probably needs restructuring anyway (e.g. to check its assumptions before calling multiple sub-methods), but I'm open to opinions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The code works as expected. From @kcooney's remarks in #1363
The expressions passed into these methods should call production code, not test code, and AssumptionViolationException should generally be thrown by test code.
The Javadoc can be improved but currently we haven't planned to build another JUnit 4 release.
Looking at the provided example I think it should be changed to
This was previously discussed in #1363 and I think the new treatment of
ErrorCollector. checkSucceeds()
is correct. HoweverErrorCollector.addError()
is more commonly used when calling sub-methods or in wrapperRules
(AOSP example) so it seems clearer (to me) to pass assumption failures through.#1702 is potential fix, although this has similar properties to what #1363 complained about, i.e. if
addError()
is used to add multiple assumption failures then they'll get re-thrown as aMultipleFailureException
causing the test to fail. It seems to me that in that case the test probably needs restructuring anyway (e.g. to check its assumptions before calling multiple sub-methods), but I'm open to opinions.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: