Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Feature request] Extend a monadic idiom u&.(m&{) to dyadic valence #212

Open
jip opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[Feature request] Extend a monadic idiom u&.(m&{) to dyadic valence #212

jip opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@jip
Copy link

jip commented Oct 2, 2024

An idiom u&.(m&{) is monadic only implementing:

m}&y u m&{ y           NB. u&.(m&{) y

I propose to extend it to support dyadic application implementing:

m}&y (m&{ x) u m&{ y    NB. x u&.(m&{) y

That is, to make an idiom u&.(m&{) ambivalent.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jip