You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
CE-based eras come in pairs, i.e. negative values of CE are BCE; negative values of BCE are CE. There is currently no concept of this in era. I can think of two ways to add it:
As part of the definition of an era, e.g. add an inverse attribute that contains another era.
As a function, which takes a year vector with negative values and splits it into two positive vectors with paired eras.
The underlying question is whether it makes sense to support paired eras in analytical use (in which case we'd need 1) or just for printing and plotting (then 2 would be enough).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
CE-based eras come in pairs, i.e. negative values of CE are BCE; negative values of BCE are CE. There is currently no concept of this in era. I can think of two ways to add it:
inverse
attribute that contains another era.The underlying question is whether it makes sense to support paired eras in analytical use (in which case we'd need 1) or just for printing and plotting (then 2 would be enough).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: