You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Just a random thought, in a true unix tradition, be nice to be able to do things like
$ find <whatever> | fselect max(size)
This way fselect would be more composable with other tools. E.g., could do things like fd | fselect | fzf (with fd being lightning-fast when going through massive numbers of files, so you could narrow it down before filtering it with more detail). In theory, you could also pipe fselect into fselect, why not? :)
Syntax-wise, maybe the whole from clause could be then omitted, and if there's anything being piped in, it would filter those results instead of searching in the current folder.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just a random thought, in a true unix tradition, be nice to be able to do things like
This way fselect would be more composable with other tools. E.g., could do things like
fd | fselect | fzf
(with fd being lightning-fast when going through massive numbers of files, so you could narrow it down before filtering it with more detail). In theory, you could also pipefselect
intofselect
, why not? :)Syntax-wise, maybe the whole
from
clause could be then omitted, and if there's anything being piped in, it would filter those results instead of searching in the current folder.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: